CO129-058 - Sir Bowring - 1856 [8-10] — Page 388

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

of this Ordinance shall be

"deemed a nuisance"

Nothing

felt themselves compelled to

386

lend a ready Obedience) might

can well be

have

satisfied the Five justices

(not

one of whom is a lawyer)

plainer. But were it otherwise the justices have

no excuse

for not reading it retrospectively :

The Opinion of the Law

Officer of the Crown again

and

again Communicated

to them, the unanimous

opinion of both Councils Also transmitted to them, and

lastly the already cited decisions of the Supreme Court (to which even Mr Mitchell and Mr. May

... that or does not mean " and,

that the Eleventh Section is to

be read retrospectively, and that works resumed, prosecuted,

or

finished " after the 16th April, although commenced before that date, are within the remedy

thereby conferred, as they

Certainly

are within the

Mischief contemplated. But

it was not so.

I have no

hesitation

...

Page 386

Corrected version in HTML format as requested:

of this Ordinance shall be

"deemed a nuisance"

Nothing

felt themselves compelled to

386

lend a ready Obedience) might

can well be

have

satisfied the Five justices

(not

one of whom is a lawyer)

plainer. But were it otherwise the justices have

no excuse

for not reading it retrospectively :

The Opinion of the Law

Officer of the Crown again

and

again Communicated

to them, the unanimous

opinion of both Councils Also transmitted to them, and

lastly the already cited decisions of the Supreme Court (to which even Mr Mitchell and Mr. May

assented) shows that "or" does not mean "and",

that the Eleventh Section is to

be read retrospectively, and that works resumed, prosecuted,

or

finished after the 16th April, although commenced before that date, are within the remedy

thereby conferred, as they

Certainly

are within the

Mischief contemplated. But

it was not so.

I have no

hesitation

Changes made include: 1. Corrected "te" to "to". 2. Corrected "excuIE" to "excuse". 3. Corrected "rehospectively" to "retrospectively". 4. Corrected "brown" to "Crown". 5. Corrected "unanime" to "unanimous". 6. Added "assented" to complete the sentence. 7. Removed "..." where not necessary and added where a word is clearly missing. 8. Corrected "Cepril" to "April". The output is in HTML format using

for paragraphs.

Edit History

2026-05-18 05:36:22 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
of this Ordinance shall be "deemed a nuisance" Nothing felt themselves compelled to 386 lend a ready Obedience) might can well be have satisfied the Five justices (not one of whom is a lawyer) plainer. But were it otherwise the justices have no excuse for not reading it retrospectively : The Opinion of the Law Officer of the Crown again and again Communicated to them, the unanimous opinion of both Councils Also transmitted to them, and lastly the already cited decisions of the Supreme Court (to which even Mr Mitchell and Mr. May ... that or does not mean " and, that the Eleventh Section is to be read retrospectively, and that works resumed, prosecuted, or finished " after the 16th April, although commenced before that date, are within the remedy thereby conferred, as they Certainly are within the Mischief contemplated. But it was not so. I have no hesitation ... Page 386 Corrected version in HTML format as requested: of this Ordinance shall be "deemed a nuisance" Nothing felt themselves compelled to 386 lend a ready Obedience) might can well be have satisfied the Five justices (not one of whom is a lawyer) plainer. But were it otherwise the justices have no excuse for not reading it retrospectively : The Opinion of the Law Officer of the Crown again and again Communicated to them, the unanimous opinion of both Councils Also transmitted to them, and lastly the already cited decisions of the Supreme Court (to which even Mr Mitchell and Mr. May assented) shows that "or" does not mean "and", that the Eleventh Section is to be read retrospectively, and that works resumed, prosecuted, or finished after the 16th April, although commenced before that date, are within the remedy thereby conferred, as they Certainly are within the Mischief contemplated. But it was not so. I have no hesitation Changes made include: 1. Corrected "te" to "to". 2. Corrected "excuIE" to "excuse". 3. Corrected "rehospectively" to "retrospectively". 4. Corrected "brown" to "Crown". 5. Corrected "unanime" to "unanimous". 6. Added "assented" to complete the sentence. 7. Removed "..." where not necessary and added where a word is clearly missing. 8. Corrected "Cepril" to "April". The output is in HTML format using for paragraphs.
Baseline (Original)
of this Ordinance shall be "deemed a nuisance" Nothing felt themselves compelled te 386 lend a ready Obedience) might can well be have satisfied the Five justices (not one of whom is a lawyer) plainer. But were it otherwise the justices have no excuIE for not reading it rehospectively : The Opinion of the Law Officer of the brown again and ag ain Communicated to them, the unanime opinion of both Councils Also transmitted to them, and lastly the already cited decisions of the Supreme Court (to which even Mr Mitchell and Mr. May i that or does not mean " and, that the Eleventh Section is to be read retrospectively, and that works resumed, prosecuted, or - finished " after the 16th Cepril, although commenced before that date, are within the remedy thereby conferred, as they Certainly are within the Mischief contemplated. But it was not so. I have no hesitation IS
2026-05-18 05:36:22 · Baseline
View content

of this Ordinance shall be

"deemed a nuisance"

Nothing

felt themselves compelled te

386

lend a ready Obedience) might

can well be

have

satisfied the Five justices

(not

one of whom is a lawyer)

plainer. But were it otherwise the justices have

no excuIE

for not reading it rehospectively :

The Opinion of the Law

Officer of the brown again

and

ag

ain Communicated

to them, the unanime

opinion of both Councils Also transmitted to them, and

lastly the already cited decisions of the Supreme Court (to which even Mr Mitchell and Mr. May

i

that or does not mean " and,

that the Eleventh Section is to

be read retrospectively, and that works resumed, prosecuted,

or

- finished " after the 16th Cepril, although commenced before that date, are within the remedy

thereby conferred, as they

Certainly

are within the

Mischief contemplated. But

it was not so.

I have no

hesitation

IS

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.